| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/12/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, M. L. B. da; CANTAO, M. E.; MEZZARI, M. P.; MA, J.; NOSSA, C. W. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCIO LUIS BUSI DA SILVA, CNPSA; MAURICIO EGIDIO CANTAO, CNPSA; MELISSA PAOLA MEZZARI, UNOESC; JIE MA, China University of Petroleum. College of Chemical Engineering. Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing.; CARLOS WOLFGANG NOSSA, Rice University. Departament of Ecology and Evolutionary. |
|
Título: |
Assessment of Bacterial and Archaeal Community Structure in Swine Wastewater Treatment Processes. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Microbial Ecology, Netherlands, v. 86, p. 106-112, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Microbial communities from two field-scale swine wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were assessed by pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragments. Effluent samples from secondary (anaerobic covered lagoons and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket [UASB]) and tertiary treatment systems (open-pond natural attenuation lagoon and air-sparged nitrification-denitrification tank followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation process) were analyzed. A total of 56,807 and 48,859 highquality reads were obtained from bacterial and archaeal libraries, respectively. Dominant bacterial communities were associated with the phylum Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. Bacteria and archaea diversity were highest in UASB effluent sample. Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and/or Prevotella were used as indicators of putative pathogen reduction throughout the WWTPs. Satisfactory pathogen reduction was observed after the open-pond natural attenuation lagoon but not after the airsparged nitrification/denitrification followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation treatment processes. Among the archaeal communities, 80 % of the reads was related to hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanospirillum. Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens detected in effluent samples from the anaerobic covered lagoons and UASB suggested that CO2 reduction with H2 was the dominant methanogenic pathway in these systems. Overall, the results served to improve our current understanding of major microbial communities? changes downgradient from the pen and throughout swine WWTP as a result of different treatment processes. MenosMicrobial communities from two field-scale swine wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were assessed by pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragments. Effluent samples from secondary (anaerobic covered lagoons and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket [UASB]) and tertiary treatment systems (open-pond natural attenuation lagoon and air-sparged nitrification-denitrification tank followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation process) were analyzed. A total of 56,807 and 48,859 highquality reads were obtained from bacterial and archaeal libraries, respectively. Dominant bacterial communities were associated with the phylum Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. Bacteria and archaea diversity were highest in UASB effluent sample. Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and/or Prevotella were used as indicators of putative pathogen reduction throughout the WWTPs. Satisfactory pathogen reduction was observed after the open-pond natural attenuation lagoon but not after the airsparged nitrification/denitrification followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation treatment processes. Among the archaeal communities, 80 % of the reads was related to hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanospirillum. Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens detected in effluent samples from the anaerobic covered lagoons and UASB suggested that CO2 reduction with H2 was the dominant methanogenic pathway in these systems. Overall, the results served to impr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Animal waste management; Tratamento de efluentes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bacteriologia; Dejeto; Suíno; Tratamento da água. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Bacteriology; Swine; Wastewater treatment. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02464naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2001609
005 2014-12-05
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, M. L. B. da
245 $aAssessment of Bacterial and Archaeal Community Structure in Swine Wastewater Treatment Processes.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aMicrobial communities from two field-scale swine wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were assessed by pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragments. Effluent samples from secondary (anaerobic covered lagoons and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket [UASB]) and tertiary treatment systems (open-pond natural attenuation lagoon and air-sparged nitrification-denitrification tank followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation process) were analyzed. A total of 56,807 and 48,859 highquality reads were obtained from bacterial and archaeal libraries, respectively. Dominant bacterial communities were associated with the phylum Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. Bacteria and archaea diversity were highest in UASB effluent sample. Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and/or Prevotella were used as indicators of putative pathogen reduction throughout the WWTPs. Satisfactory pathogen reduction was observed after the open-pond natural attenuation lagoon but not after the airsparged nitrification/denitrification followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation treatment processes. Among the archaeal communities, 80 % of the reads was related to hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanospirillum. Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens detected in effluent samples from the anaerobic covered lagoons and UASB suggested that CO2 reduction with H2 was the dominant methanogenic pathway in these systems. Overall, the results served to improve our current understanding of major microbial communities? changes downgradient from the pen and throughout swine WWTP as a result of different treatment processes.
650 $aBacteriology
650 $aSwine
650 $aWastewater treatment
650 $aBacteriologia
650 $aDejeto
650 $aSuíno
650 $aTratamento da água
653 $aAnimal waste management
653 $aTratamento de efluentes
700 1 $aCANTAO, M. E.
700 1 $aMEZZARI, M. P.
700 1 $aMA, J.
700 1 $aNOSSA, C. W.
773 $tMicrobial Ecology, Netherlands$gv. 86, p. 106-112, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
CARVALHO, P. E. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
PAULO ERNANI RAMALHO CARVALHO, CNPF. |
|
Título: |
Bom-nome: Maytenus rigida. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CARVALHO, P. E. R. Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2014. v. 5, p. 141-148. |
|
Série: |
(Coleção espécies arbóreas brasileiras, v. 5). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
NOMES VULGARES POR UNIDADES DA FEDERAÇÃO: em Alagoas, bom-nome; na Bahia, bom-nome, bonomeiro, colher, espinheira-santa e pau-de-colher; no Ceará, bom-nome e casca-grossa; em Goiás, espinheira-santa; em Minas Gerais, bom-nome e pau-de-colher; na Paraíba, bom-nome e bonome; em Pernambuco, bom-nome e bom-nome-verdadeiro; no Rio Grande do Norte, bom-nome e cabelo-de-negro; em Sergipe, bom-nome. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bom-nome; Descrição; Maytenus rigida; Ocorrência; Uso. |
|
Thesagro: |
Crescimento; Espécie Nativa; Madeira; Nomenclatura; Taxonomia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232025/1/Especies-Arboreas-Brasileiras-vol-5-Bom-Nome.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01147naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2140436
005 2022-02-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCARVALHO, P. E. R.
245 $aBom-nome$bMaytenus rigida.
260 $c2014
490 $a(Coleção espécies arbóreas brasileiras, v. 5).
520 $aNOMES VULGARES POR UNIDADES DA FEDERAÇÃO: em Alagoas, bom-nome; na Bahia, bom-nome, bonomeiro, colher, espinheira-santa e pau-de-colher; no Ceará, bom-nome e casca-grossa; em Goiás, espinheira-santa; em Minas Gerais, bom-nome e pau-de-colher; na Paraíba, bom-nome e bonome; em Pernambuco, bom-nome e bom-nome-verdadeiro; no Rio Grande do Norte, bom-nome e cabelo-de-negro; em Sergipe, bom-nome.
650 $aCrescimento
650 $aEspécie Nativa
650 $aMadeira
650 $aNomenclatura
650 $aTaxonomia
653 $aBom-nome
653 $aDescrição
653 $aMaytenus rigida
653 $aOcorrência
653 $aUso
773 $tIn: CARVALHO, P. E. R. Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2014.$gv. 5, p. 141-148.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
